Abstract
In press
Background. Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a prevalent cause of neurogenic symptoms in older adults and is frequently managed surgically when conservative therapy fails. Comparative effectiveness of decompression and fusion strategies in DLS remain debated in contemporary evidence.
Aim. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and biomechanical rationale of the proprietary MIS-PLIF technique using distraction cages in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Materials and Methods. Pre-clinical FEA was provided in a detailed three-dimensional lumbosacral model (L3–S1). Clinical study was as a prospective, controlled, single-center interventional enrolling 24 patients with symptomatic DLS (median age 56 years; 18 females and 6 males; median body mass index 32 kg/m²). Patients of the main group were treated with the proprietary MIS-PLIF distraction-cage method, of comparison group – with standard MIS-PLIF using static cages, and a control group managed with alternative interbody fusion strategies. Non-parametric statistical testing was used at p<0.05. The research was conducted as a private initiative of the authors, did not receive funding from grant programs.
Research Ethics. The study was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional ethics committee (Protocol No.7 of October 10, 2017).
Results. In the clinical stage, the main group (n=5) treated with the proprietary MIS-PLIF technique exhibited significantly lower operative trauma: median blood loss was 100 mL compared to 500 mL in the control group (p<0.05). Operative time was reduced by half, reaching 180 min versus 360 min in open surgical approaches (p<0.05). Early clinical outcomes in the main group included a more pronounced reduction in pain intensity (VAS median decrease of 4 points) and improved functional status (ODI median improvement of 10 points). Radiographic assessment confirmed the method's superiority in restoring intervertebral disc height (median +10 mm) and effective correction of sagittal alignment parameters (SVA, PT, SS), facilitating accelerated patient recovery.
Conclusions. The tested MIS-PLIF technique using an expandable distraction cage appears feasible and clinically advantageous in early outcomes, providing a coherent biomechanical and medical rationale.
Keywords: segmental lordosis restoration, spinal-pelvic balance, distraction cage biomechanics, sagittal alignment correction, postoperative neurological recovery, minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion clinical outcomes.
References
García-Ramos CL, Valenzuela-González J, Baeza-Álvarez VB, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Reyes-Sánchez A. Degenerative spondylolisthesis I: general principles. Acta Ortop Mex. 2020;34(5):324-8. DOI: 10.35366/97997. PMID: 33634638
Chung CC, Shimer AL. Lumbosacral Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis. Clin Sports Med. 2021;40(3):471-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2021.03.004.
Bydon M, Alvi MA, Goyal A. Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Definition, Natural History, Conservative Management, and Surgical Treatment. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019;30(3):299-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2019.02.003. PMID: 31078230.
García-Ramos CL, Valenzuela-González J, Baeza-Álvarez VB, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpízar-Aguirre A, Reyes-Sánchez A. Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis II: treatment and controversies. Acta Ortop Mex. 2020;34(6):433-40. PMID: 34020526.
Li N, Scofield J, Mangham P, Cooper J, Sherman W, Kaye A. Spondylolisthesis. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022;14(4):36917. DOI: 10.52965/001c.36917. PMID: 35910544.
Kgomotso EL, Hellum C, Fagerland MW, Solberg T, Brox JI, Storheim K, et al. Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a ran-domised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2024;386:e079771. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079771. PMID: 39111800.
Lin L-H, Lin T-Y, Chang K-V, Wu W-T, Özçakar L. Effectiveness of Lumbar Segmental Stabilization Exercises in Managing Disability and Pain Intensity Among Patients with Lumbar Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024(21):1512–20. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004989. PMID: 38514931.
Arts MP, Wolfs JF, Kuijlen JM, de Ruiter GC. Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial). BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e017882. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017882. PMID: 29133325.
Hammad A, Wirries A, Ardeshiri A, Nikiforov O, Geiger F. Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):229. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1266-y. PMID: 31331364.
Lu VM, Kerezoudis P, Gilder HE, McCutcheon BA, Phan K, Bydon M. Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Surgery Spinal Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(3):E177-85. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001731. PMID: 27285899.
Ntoukas V, Müller A. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010;53(1):21-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247560. PMID: 20376740.
Yang Y, Liu Z-Y, Zhang L-M, Pang M, Chhantyal K, Wu W-B, et al. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Dis-eases: 5-Year Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e602-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.049. PMID: 29778600.
Daher M, Rezk A, Baroudi M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Gregorczyk JG, McDermott JR, et al. Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Grading: Current Standards and Important Factors to Consider for Management. World Neurosurg. 2024;190:311-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.194. PMID: 39094941.
Jia H, Zhang Z, Qin J, Bao L, Ao J, Qian H. Management for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthe-sis: a network meta-analysis and systematic review basing on randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2024;110(5):3050-9. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001228. PMID: 38446872.
Wu Y, Shen R, Li S, Luo T, Rong L, Zhang L. Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Sys-tematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World Neurosurg. 2024;185:327-337.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.051. PMID: 38369106.
Guven AE, Zadeh AT, Chiapparelli E, Evangelisti G, Köhli P, Burkhard MD, et al. Short-Term Out-comes of a Novel Non-Screw Based Expandable Posterior Interbody Fusion Cage. World Neurosurg. 2025;194:123530. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.113. PMID: 39631670.
Wang Z, Zhang D, Zhang Z, Miao J. The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Bal-timore). 2024;103(25):e38431. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038431. PMID: 38905365.
Li J-R, Yan Y, Wu X-G, He L-M, Feng H-Y. Biomechanical evaluation of Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biome-chanical analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2024;27(3):285-95. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2183348. PMID: 36847747.
Encarnacion-Santos D, Nurmukhametov R, Donasov M, Volovich A, Bozkurt I, Wellington J, et al. Management of lumbar spondylolisthesis: A retrospective analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024;15(1):99-104. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_74_23. PMID: 36847747.
Segi N, Nakashima H, Shinjo R, Kagami Y, Machino M, Ito S, et al. Trabecular Bone Remodeling After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Porous Tantalum and Titani-um-Coated Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages. Global Spine J. 2024;14(7):2106-15. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231170613. PMID: 37060284.
Wang C, Qi H, Zhao Z, Zu F, Yuan H, Li X, et al. An Examination of the Relationship Between Spinal-Pelvic Morphology and Lower Lumbar Facet Joint Remodeling in Individuals with Mild Degenera-tive Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg. 2025;201:124242. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124242. PMID: 40639757.
Polly DW, Haselhuhn JJ, Soriano PBO, Odland K, Jones KE. Management of High-Grade Dysplas-tic Spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2023;34(4):567-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.06.003. PMID: 37718103.
Sima S, Chen X, Sheldrick K, Lu A, Diwan AD. Imaging predictors of progression of lumbar spon-dylolysis to spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine J. 2024;24(8):1431-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.010. PMID: 38499064.
Guo J, Fan Y, Diao H, Fan J, Zhang J, Li J, et al. Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Decom-pression with or without Fusion on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Caused by Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolis-thesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2025;194:123512. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.095. PMID: 39603451.
Rangwalla K, Filley A, El Naga A, Gendelberg D, Baldwin A, Maziad A, et al. Degenerative lum-bar spondylolisthesis: review of current classifications and proposal of a novel classification system. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(5):1762-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07818-x. PMID: 37543967.
Nedelea D-G, Vulpe DE, Gherghiceanu F, Capitanu BS, Dragosloveanu S, Stoica IC. Surgical and non-surgical management of spondylolisthesis: a comprehensive review. J Med Life. 2025;18(3):196-207. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2025-0039. PMID: 40291940.
Studnicka K, Ampat G. Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560679/ [accessed 17 Apr 2025].
Taniguchi Y, Oshima Y, Tanaka S. Lumbar Spondylolysis: Future Perspectives. JMA J. 2024;7(4):541-2. DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0202. PMID: 39513053.
Pereira P, Park Y, Arzoglou V, Charles YP, Krutko A, Senker W, et al. Anterolateral versus posteri-or minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up. Spine J. 2023;23(10):1494-505. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.05.013. PMID: 37236367.
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2-18. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05. PMID: 27683674.
Stognii AV, Piatykop VO, Babalian IO. Substantiation and development of an optimal method of minimally invasive posterior interbody stabilization of vertebrae using distraction cages in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal. 2025;31(2):55-64. DOI: 10.25305/unj.322446.
Stognii АV, Piatykop VO, Yaresko OV, Popuyskapka KO, Pidgaiska OO, Karpinsky МY. Study of stress distribution in a model of posterior intervertebral spondylodesis of the lumbar spine (PEEK implant and distraction cage). Trauma. 2022;23(6):47-55. DOI: 10.22141/1608-1706.6.23.2022.923.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

