MODERN VIEWS OF GERD IN CHILDREN: PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES
PDF

How to Cite

Slobodianiuk, O. (2017). MODERN VIEWS OF GERD IN CHILDREN: PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES. Inter Collegas, 4(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.35339/ic.4.2.65-71

Abstract

Slobodianiuk O.L.

In recent years much attention has been paid to the upper digestive tract diseases in children, particularly GERD, as a reason t,hat has an impact on quality of life even in children of school age and thereafter in young adults. Scientists came to a consensus that all examinations which are used in pediatric practice must be maximally available, simple and non-invasive to the extent practical for child’s condition.

The question about practicability of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for all patients with complaints of heartburn and with other symptoms of GERD, the question relative to performing ultrasonography of the esophagus for children as an additional method of examination, usage of questionnaire in pediatric practice, formation of disease course prediction algorithm, and identification of preventive measures specific to every patient remain open.

Therefore the goal of this research is to provide an overview of modern literature with reference to problematic issues of clinical evidence, risk factors, diagnostics, prediction of gastroesophageal reflux disease course in children of different age (regarding main causative and pathogenic factors, clinical evidence (esophageal and extra-esophageal), diagnostic methods and modern approaches to gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment).

Key words: gastroesophageal reflux disease, non-invasive diagnostics, risk factors, prediction of disease course.

 

СУЧАСНІ ПОГЛЯДИ НА ГЕРХ У ДІТЕЙ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТА ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ

Слободянюк О.Л.

Останнім часом багато уваги приділяється захворюванням верхніх відділів травного тракту у дітей, зокрема й ГЕРХ,  як причині, що призводить до порушення якості життя вже у дітей шкільного віку, а в подальшому і у людей молодого віку. Вчені дійшли консенсусу, що всі обстеження, які використовуються в педіатричній практиці повинні бути максимально доступними, простими та неінвазивними, наскільки це дозволяє стан дитини.

Залишається відкритим питання про доцільність проведення ФЕГДС всім пацієнтам зі скаргами на печію та іншими симптомами ГЕРХ , питання щодо застосування УЗД стравоходу у дітей як додаткового методу обстеження, використання опитувальників в педіатричній практиці, формування алгоритмів прогнозування перебігу захворювання та визначення профілактичних заходів  індивідуально для кожного пацієнта.

Отже, метою цієї роботи було виконати огляд сучасної літератури з проблемних питань клінічних проявів, факторів ризику, діагностики, прогнозування перебігу гастроезофагеальної рефлексної хвороби у дітей різного віку (з питань основних етіологічних та патогенетичних факторів, клінічних проявів (стравохідних та позастравохідних), методів діагностики та сучасних підходів до лікування гастроезофагеальної рефлексної хвороби).

Ключові слова: гастроезофагеальна рефелюксна хвороба, неінвазивна діагностика, фактори ризику, прогнозування перебігу.

 

 СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ВЗГЛЯДЫ НА ГЕРБ У ДЕТЕЙ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ

Слободянюк А.Л.

В последнее время больше внимания уделяется заболеванием верхних отделов пищеварительного тракта у детей, в том числе и ГЭРБ, как причине, которая приводит к нарушению качества жизни уже у детей школьного возраста, а в дальнейшем и у людей молодого возраста. Ученые пришли к консенсусу, что все обследования, которые используются в педиатрической практике должны быть максимально доступными, простыми и неинвазивными, насколько это позволяет состояние ребенка. Остается открытым вопрос о целесообразности проведения ФЭГДС всем пациентам с жалобами на изжогу и другими симптомами ГЭРБ, вопросы применения УЗИ пищевода у детей в качестве дополнительного метода обследования, использование опросников в педиатрической практике, формирование алгоритмов прогнозирования течения заболевания и определения профилактических мероприятий индивидуально для каждого пациента.

Итак, целью этой работы было выполнить обзор современной литературы по проблемным вопросам клинических проявлений, факторов риска, диагностики, прогнозирования течения гастроэзофагеальной рефлексной болезни у детей разного возраста (по вопросам основных этиологических и патогенетических факторов, клинических проявлений (пищеводных и внепищеводных), методов диагностики и современных подходов к лечению гастроэзофагеальной рефлексной болезни).

Ключевые слова: гастроэзофагеальная рефелюксная болезнь, неинвазивная диагностика, факторы риска, прогнозирование течения.

https://doi.org/10.35339/ic.4.2.65-71
PDF

References

Falk, G. W. (2014). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages ХІ-ХІІ.– DOI - 10.1016/j.gtc.2014.01.001.

Gastro-oesophageal reflflux disease: recognition, diagnosis and management in children and young people NICE guideline Published: 14 January (2015). Retrieved from: nice.org.uk/guidance/ng1,© NICE.

Sheptulyn A.A. (2008). Hastroezofahealnaia refliuksnaia bolezn: spornyie i nereshennyie voprosyi [Gastroesophageal reflux disease: controversial and unresolved issues]. Klynycheskaia medytsyna. no 6. – p. 8-12.

Guy, E., Boeckxstaens, W., Rohof. O. (2013). Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 15-25– DOI 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.11.001.

Pryvorotskyi, V.F., Luppova, N.E., Herasymova, T.A. (2011). – Hastroezofahealnaia refliuksnaia bolezn (HERB) u detei [Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children]. Eksper. y klyn. hastroenterol. no 1. – S. 14-21.

Shadrin, O.H., Ihnatko, L.V. (2016). Suchasni pidkhody do likuvannya ta diahnostyky hastroezofaheal'-noyi reflyuksnoyi khvoroby u ditey [Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children]. Zdorovia Ukrainy, spets. vypusk «Hatsroenterolohiia, hematolohiia, koloproktolohiia», № 3 (41).

Shadrin, O.H. (2016). Vidhuk na dysertatsiinu robotu «Optymizatsiia diahnostyky ta likuvannia hastroezofahealnoi refleksnoi khvoroby u diteу rann'oho viku» [Feedback on dissertation "Optimization of diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants], Kyiv.

Ronkainen, J., Agreus, L. (2013). Epidemiology of reflux symptoms and GORD. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 27: 325-37. Review. DOI: 10.7727/wimjopen.2015.198

Malfertheiner, P., Megraud, F., OMorain, C.A., Atherton, J., Axon, A.T., Bazzoli, F., Kuipers, E.J. (2012). European Helicobacter Study Group. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection – the Maastricht IV. Florence Consensus Report . 61(5): 646-64. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl 2012-302084.

El-Serag, H. B., Sweet, S., Winchester, C. C., & Dent, J. (2014). Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut,63(6), 871–880.http://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269.

Fischbach, L.A., Nordenstedt, H., Kramer, J.R. (2012). The association between Barretts esophagus and Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis. Helicobacter; 17: 163-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2011.00931.x.

Zhuo, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y. (2008). Helicobacter pylori infection and oesophageal cancer risk: association studies via evidence-based meta-analyses. Clinical Oncology.20: 757-62. - DOI 10.1016/j.clon.2008.07.005

World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines . Global Perspective on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Richard Hunt (UK/Canada), David Armstrong (Canada), Peter Katelaris (Australia). October, (2015).

Hopkins, J. (2015). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)/heartburn in children. Medicine. Retrieved from: www.hopkinsmedicine.org/healthlibrary/conditions/pediatrics/gastroesophageal_reflux_disease_gerdheartburn_in_children_90,P01994/.

Lazebnyk, L.B., Bordyn, D.S.,. Masharova, A.A. (2007). Sovremennoe ponymanye hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi bolezny: ot Henvalia k Monrealiu [Modern understanding of gastroesophageal reflux disease: from Henvalya to Montreal]. Eksperymentalnaia y klynycheskaia hastroenterolohyia. 5: 4—10.

Shadrіn, O.H. (2009). Pedyatrycheskye aspekty hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi bolezny [Pediatric aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease]. Zdorovia Ukrainy. 6/1: 11.

Varil, M.F., Van Zanten, S.V., Kahrilas, P.E. (2006). The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A global evidence based consensus. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101:1900—1920. - DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x

Zubarenko, O.V., Kravchenko, T.Yu. (2013). Suchasnyi pohliad na hastroezofahealnu refliuksnu khvorobu u ditei [The modern view of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children]. Perynatolohyia y pedyatryia. 1(53): 114-122.

Boiarska, L.M., Ivanova, K.O. (2010). Do pytannia pro chastotu ta osoblyvosti proiaviv hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi khvorobi [Prior to feeding on the frequency, this particular manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Sovremennaia pedyatryia. 2: 162-163.

Volosovets, O.P., Kryvopustov, S.P., Karulyna, Yu.V. (2007). Suchasnyi pohliad na problemu porushen motornoi funktsii verkhnoho viddilu travnoho kanalu [The modern approach to the problem of motor function disorders of the upper digestive tract]. Zdorove rebenka. 5 (114): 7—9.

De Bortoli, N., Ottonello, A., Zerbib, F., Sifrim, D., Gyawali, PC., Savarino, E. (2016). Between GERD and NERD: the relevance of weakly acidic reflux. N de Bortoli et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1380 (1), 218-229.

Tae Hoon Oh. J. (2011). Accuracy of the Diagnosis of GORD by Questionnaire, Physicians and a Trial of Proton.Pump Inhibitor Treatment: The Diamond Study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 17(1). DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.1.98.

The role of diet in the overlap between gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia . The Turkish Society of Gastroenterology • Retrieved from: www.turkjgastroenterol.org • DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2015.150238

Volosovets, O.P., Kryvopustov, S.P., Karulyna, Yu.V. (2007). Suchasnyi pohliad na problemu porushen motornoi funktsii verkhnoho viddilu travnevoho kanalu [The modern view on the problem of violations of motor function of the upper channel in May]. Zdorove rebenka. 5(114): 7—9.

Vasylev Yu.V. (2003). Hastroezofahealnaia refliuksnaia bolezn: Patohenez і klynyka [Gastroesophageal reflux disease: Pathogenesis and clinic]. Mezhdunar. med. zhurnal. 9 (1): 31—34.

Dudnykova E.V. (2006). Klynycheskoe znachenye bylyarnуkh refliuksov v formyrovanyy hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi bolezny і hastroduodenіtov u detei і metodу іkh korrektsyy [Clinical significance of biliary reflux in the formation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastroduodenitis in children and methods for their correction]. Klynycheskіe perspektyvу hastroenterolohyy, hepatolohyy. 5: 28—32.

Pakhomovskaia N.L. (2006). Klynycheskoe znachenye sutochnoi rN-metryy pry hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi bolezny u detei [Clinical value of daily pH-metry in gastroesophageal reflux disease in children] : avtoref. dys. k. med. n.: spets. 14.00.09 — «Pedyatryia». p.17.

Uspenskyi Yu.P., Tkachenko, E.Y. (2010). Patohenetycheskye osnovy dyfferentsyrovannoi taktyky lechenyia hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi bolezny [Pathogenetic basis of differentiated tactics of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease]. Suchasna hastroenterolohiia. 1 (51): 92—100.

Kovalenko, A.A., Belmer, S.V. (2008). Hastroezofahealnaia refliuksnaia bolezn [Gastroesophageal reflux disease]. Lechashchyi vrach. 1.

Kriuchko, T.A., Nesyna, Y.M. (2015). Optymyzatsyia dіahnostyky hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi bolezny u podrostkov s pomoshchiu oprosnyka GerdQ [Optimization diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adolescents with questionnaire GerdQ]. ZR. 7 (67).

Sheptulyn, A.A. (2008). Hastroezofahealnaia refliuksnaia bolezn: spornye y nereshennye voprosy [Gastroesophageal reflux disease: controversial and unresolved issues]. Klynycheskaia medytsyna. 6: 7—12.

Starets, E.A., Trukhalskaia, V.V. (2015). Etapnaia dyahnostyka patolohycheskoho hastroezofahealnoho refliuksa u detei [Stage diagnostics of pathological gastroesophageal reflux in children]. Zdorove rebenka. 4 (64): 47-51.

Niankovskyi, S. L., Sadova, O. R. (2015). Dynamika parametriv yakosti zhyttia pry hastroezofahealnii refliuksnii khvorobi v ditei pidlitkovoho viku. [Dynamics of parameters of quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease in adolescents.]. Aktualni pytannia pediatrii, akusherstva ta hinekolohii. 2: 48-50.

Vandenplas, Y., Rudolph, C.D., Di Lorenzo, C. (2009). North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology , Hepatology, and Nutrition; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology , Hepatology, and Nutrition. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux c linical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology , Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology , Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutrю 49(4): 498–547.DOI:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181b7f563

Jung, H.K. (2011). Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia: a systematic review . J Neurogasteroenterol Motil.17(1):14–27. DOI :10.5056/jnm.2011.17.1.14/

Kornilia Nikaki, Philip Woodland & Daniel Sifrim. (2016). Adult and paediatric GERD: diagnosis, phenotypes and avoidance of excess treatments. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 13: 529–542 DOI:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.109/

Zavyktoryna, T.H., Stryha, E.V., Sokolova, Yu.B., Zavyktoryna, T.H. (2008). Osobennosty techenyia hastroezofahealnoi refliuksnoi bolezny u detei [Features of the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children]. Lechashchyi vrach. 7: 88—89.

"Inter Collegas" is an open access journal: all articles are published in open access without an embargo period, under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution ‒ Noncommercial ‒ Share Alike) license; the content is available to all readers without registration from the moment of its publication. Electronic copies of the archive of journals are placed in the repositories of the KhNMU and V.I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine.

Copyright Agreement
1. This Agreement on the transfer of rights to use the work from the Co-authors to the publisher (hereinafter the Agreement) is concluded between all the Co-authors of the work, represented by the Corresponding Author, and Kharkiv National Medical University (hereinafter the University), represented by an authorized representative of the Editorial Board of scientific journals (hereinafter the Editorial Board).
2. This Agreement is an accession agreement within the meaning of clause 1 of Article 634 of the Civil Code of Ukraine: that is, a contract, "the terms of which are established by one of the parties in forms or other standard forms, which can be concluded only by joining the other party to the proposed contract as a whole. The other party cannot offer its terms of the contract." The party that established the terms of this contract is the University.
3. If there is more than one author, the authors choose the Corresponding Author, who communicates with the Editorial Board on his own behalf and on behalf of all Co-authors regarding the publication of a written work of a scientific nature (article or review, hereinafter referred to as the Work).
4. The contract begins from the moment of submission of the manuscript of the Work by the Corresponding Author to the Editorial Board, which confirms the following:
4.1. all Co-authors of the Work are familiar with and agree with its content, at all stages of reviewing and editing the manuscript and the existence of the published Work;
4.2. all Co-authors of the Work are familiar with and agree to the terms of this Agreement.
5. The published Work is in electronic form in public access on the websites of the University and any websites and electronic databases in which the Work is posted by the University and is available to readers under the terms of the "Creative Commons" license (Attribution NonCommercial Sharealike 4.0 International)" or more free licenses "Creative Commons 4.0".
6. The Corresponding Author transfers, and the University receives, the non-exclusive property right to use the Work by placing the latter on the University's websites for the entire term of copyright. The University participates in the creation of the final version of the Work by reviewing and editing the manuscript of the article or review provided to the Editorial Board by the Corresponding Author, translating the Work into any languages. For the participation of the University in the finalization of the Work, the Co-authors agree to pay the invoice issued to them by the University, if such payment is provided by the University. The size and procedure of such payment are not the subject of this contract.
7. The University has the right to reproduce the Work or its parts in electronic and printed forms, to make copies, permanent archival storage of the Work, distribution of the Work on the Internet, repositories, scientometric databases, commercial networks, including for monetary compensation from third parties.
8. The co-authors guarantee that the manuscript of the Work does not use works whose copyright belongs to third parties.
9. The authors of the Work guarantee that at the time of submission of the manuscript of the Work to the Editorial Board, the property rights to the Work belong only to them, neither in whole nor in part have they been transferred to anyone (not alienated), they are not the subject of a lien, litigation or claims by third parties.
10. The Work may not be posted on the University's website if it violates a person's right to the privacy of his personal and family life, harms public order and health.
11. The work may be withdrawn by the Editorial Board from the University websites, libraries and electronic databases where it was placed by the Editorial Board, in cases of detection of violations of the ethics of the authors and researchers, without any compensation for the losses of the Co-authors. At the time of submission of the manuscript to the Editorial Board and all stages of its editing and review, the manuscript must not have already been published or submitted to other editorial offices.
12. The right transferred under this Agreement extends to the territory of Ukraine and foreign countries.
13. The rights of Co-authors include the requirement to indicate their names on all copies of the Work or during any public use or public mention of the Work; the requirement to preserve the integrity of the Work; legal opposition to any distortion or other encroachment on the Work, which may harm the honor and reputation of the Co-authors.
14. Co-authors have the right to control their personal non-property rights by familiarizing themselves with the text (content) and form of the Work before its publication on the University's website, when transferring it to a printing company for reproduction or when using the Work in other ways.
15. The Co-authors, in addition to the property rights not transferred under this Agreement and taking into account the non-exclusive nature of the rights transferred under this Agreement, retain the property rights to finalize the Work and to use certain parts of the Work in other works created by the Co-authors.
16. The Co-authors are obliged to notify the Editorial Board of all errors in the Work, discovered by them independently after the publication of the Work, and to take all measures to eliminate such errors as soon as possible.
17. The University undertakes to indicate the names of the Co-authors on all copies of the Work during any public use of the Work. The list of Co-authors may be shortened according to the rules for the formation of bibliographic descriptions determined by the University or third parties.
18. The University undertakes not to violate the integrity of the Work, to agree with the Corresponding Author on all changes made to the Work during processing and editing.
19. In case of violation of their obligations under this Agreement, its parties bear the responsibility defined by this Agreement and the current legislation of Ukraine. All disputes under the Agreement are resolved through negotiations, and if the negotiations do not resolve the dispute – in the courts of the city of Kharkiv.
20. The parties are not responsible for the violation of their obligations under this Agreement, if it occurred through no fault of theirs. The party is considered innocent if it proves that it has taken all measures dependent on it for the proper fulfillment of the obligation.
21. The Co-authors are responsible for the truthfulness of the facts, quotes, references to legislative and regulatory acts, other official documentation, the scientific validity of the Work, all types of responsibility to third parties who have claimed their rights to the Work. The co-authors reimburse the University for all costs caused by claims of third parties for infringement of copyright and other rights to the Work, as well as additional material costs related to the elimination of identified defects.