How to Cite
Abstract
TREATMENT OF COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASES COMPLICATED BY OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE (review)
Sochneva A.L.
The article presents the up-to-date data concerning the treatment of common bile duct diseases complicated by obstructive jaundice. Nowadays, specialized clinics widely use mini-invasive interventions to treat this complicated pathology. Biliary tree decompression is the main objective of operative treatment. It is reasonable to perform antegrade and retrograde endobiliary interventions as preparatory and final stages of surgical treatment and in order to improve the patients’ life quality and avoid hepatic impairment progression. Reconstructive-reparative operations following prior biliary decompression yield significantly better results as compared to surgical interventions without it.
Key words: common bile duct diseases, obstructive jaundice, antegrade interventions, retrograde interventions, reconstructive-reparative operations.
ЛІКУВАННЯ ЗАХВОРЮВАНЬ ГЕПАТИКОХОЛЕДОХА, УСКЛАДНЕНИХ МЕХАНІЧНОЮ ЖОВТЯНИЦЕЮ (огляд літератури)
Сочнева А.Л.
У статті висвітлені сучасні дані по лікуванню захворювань гепатикохоледоха, ускладнених механічною жовтяницею. В даний час в спеціалізованих клініках широко застосовуються мініінвазивні втручання в лікуванні такої складної патології. Декомпресія біліарного дерева є основною метою при виконанні оперативних втручань. Антеградний і ретроградні ендобіліарні втручання доцільно застосовувати в якості як підготовчого, так і завершального етапів хірургічного лікування, а також поліпшити якість життя хворих і уникнути прогресування печінкової недостатності. Виконання реконструктивно-відновлювальні операцій після попередньої біліарної декомпресії демонструє значно кращі результати в порівнянні з оперативними втручаннями, виконаними без неї.
Ключові слова: захворювання гепатикохоледоха, механічна жовтяниця, антеградний втручання, ретроградні втручання, реконструктивно-відновлювальні операції. Лечение заболеваний гепатикохоледоха, осложненных механической желтухой: обзор литературы
ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ЗАБОЛЕВАНИЙ ГЕПАТИКОХОЛЕДОХА, ОСЛОЖНЕННЫХ МЕХАНИЧЕСКОЙ ЖЕЛТУХОЙ (обзор литературы)
Сочнева А.Л.
В статье освещены современные данные по лечению заболеваний гепатикохоледоха, осложненных механической желтухой. В настоящее время в специализированных клиниках широко применяются миниинвазивные вмешательства в лечении столь сложной патологии. Декомпрессия билиарного дерева является основной целью при выполнении оперативных вмешательств. Антеградные и ретроградные эндобилиарные вмешательства целесообразно применять в качестве как подготовительного, так и завершающего этапов хирургического лечения, а также улучшить качество жизни больных и избежать прогрессирования печеночной недостаточности. Выполнение реконструктивно-восстановительные операций после предварительной билиарной декомпрессии демонстрирует значительно лучшие результаты в сравнении с оперативными вмешательствами, выполненными без нее.
Ключевые слова: заболевания гепатикохоледоха, механическая желтуха, антеградные вмешательства, ретроградные вмешательства, реконструктивно-восстановительные операции.
References
Williams, E.J., Green, J., Beckinham, I. et al. (2008). Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). GUT. 57, 1004–1021.
Henson, D.E., Schwartz, A.M., Nsouli, H., & Albores-Saavedra, J. (2009). Carcinomas of the pancreas, gallballader, extrahepatic bile ducts, and ampulla of vater share a field for carcinogenesis a population-based study. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med, 133(1), 67–71. doi:10.1043/1543-2165-133.1.67.
Are, C., Gonen, M., D`Angelica, M., DeMatteo, R.P., Fong, Y., Blumgart, L.H., & Jarnagin, W.R. (2006). Differential diagnosis of proximal biliary obstruction. Surgery, 243, 756–763.
Pomerantz, B.J. (2009). Biliary tract interventions. Tech. Vasc. Radiol., 12, 162–170.
Kotiv, B.N., Dzidzava, I.I., Smorodskiy, A.V. et al. (2013). Chirurgicheskaya taktika pri neopukholevoy mekhanicheskoy zheltukhe [Surgical tactics in non-tumor obstructive jaundice]. Topical issues of surgical hepatology: Congress materials, Donetsk, 110.
Shevchenko, Yu.L., Vetshev, P.S., Stoyko, Yu.M., Levchuk, A.L. et al. (2008). Diagnostika sindroma mekhanicheskoy zheltukhi [Diagnosis of obstructive jaundice syndrome]. Vestn. Natsyonalnogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova, 3(2), 3–7.
Nychytailo, M.Yu., Zakharash, Yu.M., Ohorodnik, V.P., Zakharash, M.P. (2008). Diagnostychno- likuvalna taktyka z vykorystanniam miniinvazyvnych tekhnologii pry mekhanichnii zhovtianytsi, zumovlenii kholedokholitiazom [Diagnosis and treatment tactics using mini-invasive techniques in obstructive jaundice caused by choledocholithiasis]. Khirurgiya Ukrainy, 2(26), 5–11.
Kutsyk, Yu.B., Dovhanyk, Yu.I., Mikhel, Yu.M. et al. (2009). Etiologiia, patogenez, osoblyvosti khirurgichnoii taktyky u khvorykh z mekhanichnoiu zhovtianytseiu [Etiology, pathogenesis and surgical tactics in patients with obstructive jaundice]. Visn Ukr med stomat akademii, 9(1), 116–119.
Galperin, E.I., & Vetshev, P.S. (Eds.). (2009). Rukovodstvo po khirurgii zhelchnych putey [Handbook of bile duct surgery] (2nd ed.). M.: Vidar-M.
Nikfarjam, M., Staveley-O'Carroll, K.F., Kimchi, E.T., & Hardacre, J.M. (2009). Pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with a history of Roux-en Y gastric bypass surgery. JOP, 10, 169–173. 11. Galperin, E.I., Kotovskiy, A.E., & Momunova, O.N. (2011). Optimalnyi uroven bilirubinemia pered vypolneniem operatsyi u bolnykh mekhanicheskoy zheltukhoy opukholevoy etiologii [Optimum bilirubinemia level before surgery in patients with obstructive jaundice of tumor etiology]. Ann. khir.
hepatol., 1, 45–51;
Stoyko, Yu.M., Levchuk, A.L., Bardakov, V.G., & Vetshev P.S. (2008). Vozmozhnosti
sovremennykh metodov diagnostiki i obosnovanie lechebnoy taktiki pri mekhanicheskoy zheltukhe [Capabilities of modern diagnostic methods and justification of medical tactics in obstructive jaundice]. Vestnik khirurgicheskoy gastroenterologii, 2, 24–32.
Saidi, R.F., Elias, N., Ko, D.S., Kawai, Y.T., Markmann, J., Cosimi, A.B., & Hertl, M. (2009). Biliary reconstruction and complications after living-donor liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford), 11, 505–509.
Galperin, E.I. (2011). Mekhanicheskaya zheltukha: sostoyanie "mnimoy stabilnosti", posledstviya "vtorogo udara", printsipy lecheniya [Obstructive jaundice: the state of "sham stability", consequences of the "second hit", treatment principles]. Ann. khir. hepatol., 16(3), 16–25.
Dixon, J.M., Armstrong, C.P., Duffy, S.W., & Davies, G.C. (1983). Factors affecting morbidity and mortality after surgery for obstructive jaundice: A review of 373 patients. Gut, 24(9), 845–852.
Child, C.G., & Turcotte, J.G. (1964). Surgery and portal hypertension. In: C.G. Child (Ed.), The liver and portal hypertension (50-64). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Pugh, R.N., Murray-Lyon, I.M., Dawson, J.L. et al. (1973). Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophagal varices. Br. J. Surg., 60(8), 646–649.
Smith, R.A., Dajani, K., Dodd, S. et al. (2009). Preoperative Resolution of Jaundice Following Biliary Stenting Predicts More Favourable Early Survival in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 15(11), 3138–3146.
Takahashi, T., Togo, S., Tanaka, K. et al. (2008). Safe and Permissible Limits of Hepatectomy in Obstructive Jaundice Patients. Wld J. Surg., 28, 475–481.
Galperin, E.I., Akhaladze, G.G., & Kotovsky, A.E. (2009). Patogenez v lechenii ostrogo gnoynogo kholangita [Pathogenesis in treatment of acute purulent cholangitis]. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii, 14(4), 13–21.
Kutsyk, Yu.B., Dovhanyk, Yu.I., Mikhel, Yu.M. et al. (2009). Etiologiia, patogenez, osoblyvosti khirurgichnoii taktyky u khvorykh z mekhanichnoiu zhovtianytseiu [Etiology, pathogenesis and surgical tactics in patients with obstructive jaundice]. Visn Ukr med stomat akademii, 9(1), 116–119.
Baton, O., Azoulay, D., Adam, D.V., & Castaing, D. (2007). Major hepatectomy for hilar cholangicarcinoma type 3 and 4: prognostic factors and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Surg, 204, 250–260.
Chen, X.P., Lau, W.Y., Huang, Z.Y., Zhang, Z.W., Chen, Y.F., Zhang, W.G., & Qui F.Z. (2009). Extent of liver resection for hilar cholangicarcinoma. Br J Surg, 96, 1167–1175.
Shevchenko, Yu.L., Vetshev, P.S., Stoyko, Yu.M. et al. (2011). Prioritetnye napravleniya v lechenii bolnykh s mekhanicheskoy zheltukhoy [Priorities in treatment of patients with obstructive jaundice]. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii, 16(3), 9–16.
Avdosyev, Yu.V., Boyko, V.V., Abidov, E., & Lavrenteva, O.Yu. (2013). Rentgenokhirurgicheskiye vmeshatelstva v kompleksnom lechenii razlichnych zabolevaniy gepatopankreatoduodenalnoy zony, oslozhnennych mekhanicheskoy zheltukhoy [X-ray surgical interventions in integrated treatment of hepato-pancreato-duodenal diseases complicated by obstructive jaundice]. Kharkivska khirurgichna shkola, 2, 31–37.
Nichitaylo, M.Yu., Grubnik, V.V., Lurin, I.A. et al. (2013). Videoendoskopicheskaya diagnostika i minimalno invazivnaya khirurgiya kholedokholitiaza [Video endoscopic diagnosis and mini-invasive surgery of choledocholithiasis]. Kyiv: VSI "Meditsina".
Ohorodnyk, P.V., Kolomiytsev, V.I., Kushniruk, O.I. et al. (2013). Endoskopichne drenuvannia biliarnoii systemy pry hostrii obturatsii spilnoii zhovchnoii protoky [Endoscopic drainage of biliary system in acute obturation of the common bile duct]. Klinichna khirurgiia, 8, 24–29.
Istomin, N.P., Sultanov, S.A., & Arkhipov, À.À. (2005). Dvukhetapnaya taktika lecheniya zhelchnokamennoy bolezni, oslzhnennoy kholedokholitiazom [Two-stage tactics of treating cholelithiasis complicated by choledocholithiasis]. Khirurgiya, 1, 48–50.
Alekseev, N.A., Snigirev, Yu.V., Taraskina, Ye.B. et al. (2012). Laparoskopicheskiye i minilaparotomnye operatsii v lechenii kholetsystokholedokholitiaza [Laparoscopic and minilaparotomic operations in the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis]. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii, 17(3), 75–79.
Balalykin, A.S, Gvozdik, V.V., Ulyanov, D.N. et al. (2006). O nereshennych problemach endoskopicheskoy chrespapillarnoy khirurgii kholangiolitiaza [On unsolved problems of endoscopic transpapillary surgery of cholangiolithiasis]. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii, 11(3), 70.
Kulezneva, Yu.V., Bruslik, S.V., Musaev, G.Kh. et al. (2011). Antegradnye metody dekompressii zhelchnych protokov: evolutsiya I spornye voprosy [Antegrade methods of bile duct decompression: evolution and controversial issues]. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii, 16, 35–43.
Shimizu, T., & Yoshida, K. (1978). The rule of the serum bilirubin changes after biliary decompression in patients with severe jaundice. Hepatologica Jap, 19, 479–485.
INTER COLLEGAS, VOL. 5, No.2 (2018) ISSN 2409-9988
SURGERY
Mansfield, D.D., Sen, G., Oppong, K. et al. (2006). Increase in serum bilirubin levels in obstructive jaundice secondary to pancreatic and periampullary malignancy – implications for timiting of resectional surgery and use of biliary drainage. HPB, 8, 442–445.
Van der Gaag, N.A., Rauws, E.A., van Eijck, C.H. et al. (2010). Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N. Engl. J. Med, 362(2), 129–137.
Zabazny, N.P., Zhuravlev, M.N., Groshev, I.A. et al. (2007). Otvedenie zhelchi pri vysokoy opukholevoy obturatsii vnepechenochnych zhelchnych putey [Removal of bile in high tumor obturation of extrahepatic bile ducts]. Rossiyskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal, 4, 32–34.
Kanikovskyi, O.Ye., & Kharchuk O.V. (2009). Etapna biliarna dekompresiia pry kholangiti ta mekhanichnii zhovtianytsi [Stagewise biliary decompression in cholangitis and obstructive jaundice]. Ukr. Zhurn. khirurgii, 1, 54–57.
Nychytaylo, M.E., Godlevskiy, A.I., & Savoliuk, S.I. (2013). Vybor optimalnoy taktitki khirurgicheskogo lecheniya oslozhnennykh form neopukholevoy obturatsionnoy zheltukhi [Selection of the optimum tactics for the surgical treatment of complicated forms of non-tumor obstructive jaundice]. Topical issues of surgical hepatology: congress materials, Donetsk, 123.
Al-Bahrani, A.Z., Holt, A., & Hamade, A.M. Acute pancreatitis in under-recognized risk of percutaneous transhepatic distal bile intervention. HPB, 8(6), 446–450.
Nychytaylo, M.E., Godlevskiy, A.I., & Savoliuk, S.I. (2013). Prognozirovanie i otsenka otdalennykh rezultatov khirurgicheskoy korrektsyi neopukholevoy obturatsyonnoy zheltukhi [Prediction and assessment of distant outcomes of surgical correction of non-tumor obstructive jaundice]. Topical issues of surgical hepatology: congress materials, Donetsk, 124.
Siplivy, V.A., Beresnev, A.V., Grinchenko, S.V. et al. (2005). Khirurgicheskoye lecheniye proksimalnykh opukholey zhelchnych protokov [Surgical treatment of proximal bile duct tumors]. Kharkivska khirurgichna shklola, 2(1), 96–98.
American Joint Committee on Cancer. (2005). AJCC Cancer Staging. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hirano, S., Kondo, S., Tanaka, E., Shichinohe, T., Tsuchikawa, T., Kato, K. et al. (2010). Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbididy and mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci., 17, 455–462.
Jane, I. Tsao, Yuji, Nimuta, Junichi, Kamiya et al. (2006). Management of Hilar Cholangicarcinoma: Comparsion of an American and Japanice Experience. Annals of Surgery, 232, 166–174.
Harmeet, M., & Gregory, G. (2006). Cholangiocarcinoma modern advances in understanding a deadly old disease. J Hepatol, 45(6), 856–867.
Klatskin, G. (1965). Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic ducts at its bifurcation within the porta hepatic. Am J Med, 38, 241–256.
Bismuth, H., & Corlette, M.B. (1975). Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 140, 170–178.
Kuang, D., Wang, G. (2010). Hilar ñholangiocarcinoma: Pathology and tumor biology. Front. Med. China, 4, 371–377.
Kazuhiro, Otani, Kazuo, Chijiiwa, Masahiro, Kai et al. (2008). Outcome of Surgical Treatment of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg., 12, 1033–1040.
Kawasaki, S., Imamura, H., Kobayashi, A., Terumasa, N., Miwa, S., & Miyagawa, S. (2003). Results of Surgical Resection for Patients With Hilar Bile Duct Cancer. Ann Surg, 238(1), 84–92.
Boyko, V. V., & Maloshtan, A.V. (2008). Kliniko-anatomicheskoe obosnovanie radikal'nykh operatsii pri rake vnepechenochnykh zhelchnykh putei [Clinical-anatomic substantiation of radical surgery for cancer of the extrahepatic biliary tract] // Kharkovskaya khirurgicheskaya shkola, 4, 105–113.
Dotsenko, A.P., & Zinchenko, E.I. (1977). Rak zhelchnogo puzyrya i vnepechenochnykh zhelchnykh putei [Cancer of the gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary tract]. M.: Meditsina.
Burnevich, E. (2004). Cholangiocarcinoma and carcinoma of the bile duct. Doctor, 11, 18–22.
Vishnevsky, V.A., Tarasyuk, T.I., & Ikramov, R.Z. (2005). Radical surgery for cancer of the proximal bile duct. Annals of surgical hepatology, 10(3), 35–42.
Nazyrov, F.G., Ikramov, A.I., Akbar, M.M. et al. (2010). Diagnosis and tactics of surgical treatment of patients with tumors of the proximal bile duct. Surgery, 6, 36–39.
Shalimov, A.A., Kopchak, V.M., Dronov, A.I. et al. (2001). The clinic, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Clinical surgery, 6, 11–14.
Neuhaus, P., Jonas, S., Bechstein, W.O., Lohmann, R., Radke, C., Kling, N. et al. (1999). Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg, 230, 808–818.
Igami, T., Nishio, H., Ebata, T. et al. (2010). Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the "new era" the Nagoya University experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 17, 449–454.
Nathan, H., Pawlik, T.M., Wolfgang, C.L. et al. (2007). Trends in survival after surgery for cholangiocarcinoma a 30-year population - based SEER database analysis. J Gastrointest Surg, 11, 1488–1496.
Timm, S., Gassel, H.J., & Thiede, A. (2007). Surgical therapy of proximal extrahepatic bile duct tumors (Klatskin tumors). Zentralbl Chir., 132, 328–335.
Seyama, Y., Kubota, K., Sano, K., Noie, T., Takayama, T., Kosuge, T. åt al. (2003). Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg, 238, 73–78.
Nagino, M., Kamiya, J., Arai, T. åt al. (2006). "Anatomic" right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg, 2006, 243, 28–32. 62. Murakami, Y., Uemura, K., Sudo, T., Hashimoto, Y., Nakashima, A., Kondo, N., Sakabe, R., Ohge, H., & Sueda T. (2011). Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar and
distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 18, 453–457.
Nimura, Y., Kamiya, J., Kondo, S. et al. (2000). Aggressive preoperative management and
extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg., 7, 155–162.
Yoshida, H., Mamada Y., Taniai N. et al. (2006). One-step palliative treatment method for obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable malignancies by percutaneous transhepatic insertion of an expandable metallic stent. World J. Gastroenterol, 12(15), 2423–2426.
Borisova, N.A., Borisov, A.E., Kareev, A.V. (2003). Endobiliarnye metody korrektsii mekhanicheskoy zheltukhi [Endobiliary methods of obstructive jaundice correction]. In: A.E. Borisov (Ed.), Rukovodstvo po khirurgii pecheni i zhelchevyvodyashchich putey [Handbook of liver and bile duct surgery]. SPb: Skifiya, Vol. 2, 254–281.
Kaassis M., Boyer J., Dumas R. et al. (2003). Plastic or metal stent for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc, 57, 178–182. 67. Suk, K.T., Kim, H.S., Kim, J.W. et al. (2006). Risk factors of cholecystitis after metal stent
placement in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest. Endosc., 4, 876–881.
Al-Bahrani, A.Z., Holt, A., Hamade, A.M. (2006). Acute pancreatitis in under-recognized risk
of percutaneous transhepatic distal bile intervention. HPB, 8(6), 446–450.
"Inter Collegas" is an open access journal: all articles are published in open access without an embargo period, under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution ‒ Noncommercial ‒ Share Alike) license; the content is available to all readers without registration from the moment of its publication. Electronic copies of the archive of journals are placed in the repositories of the KhNMU and V.I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine.
Copyright Agreement
1. This Agreement on the transfer of rights to use the work from the Co-authors to the publisher (hereinafter the Agreement) is concluded between all the Co-authors of the work, represented by the Corresponding Author, and Kharkiv National Medical University (hereinafter the University), represented by an authorized representative of the Editorial Board of scientific journals (hereinafter the Editorial Board).
2. This Agreement is an accession agreement within the meaning of clause 1 of Article 634 of the Civil Code of Ukraine: that is, a contract, "the terms of which are established by one of the parties in forms or other standard forms, which can be concluded only by joining the other party to the proposed contract as a whole. The other party cannot offer its terms of the contract." The party that established the terms of this contract is the University.
3. If there is more than one author, the authors choose the Corresponding Author, who communicates with the Editorial Board on his own behalf and on behalf of all Co-authors regarding the publication of a written work of a scientific nature (article or review, hereinafter referred to as the Work).
4. The contract begins from the moment of submission of the manuscript of the Work by the Corresponding Author to the Editorial Board, which confirms the following:
4.1. all Co-authors of the Work are familiar with and agree with its content, at all stages of reviewing and editing the manuscript and the existence of the published Work;
4.2. all Co-authors of the Work are familiar with and agree to the terms of this Agreement.
5. The published Work is in electronic form in public access on the websites of the University and any websites and electronic databases in which the Work is posted by the University and is available to readers under the terms of the "Creative Commons" license (Attribution NonCommercial Sharealike 4.0 International)" or more free licenses "Creative Commons 4.0".
6. The Corresponding Author transfers, and the University receives, the non-exclusive property right to use the Work by placing the latter on the University's websites for the entire term of copyright. The University participates in the creation of the final version of the Work by reviewing and editing the manuscript of the article or review provided to the Editorial Board by the Corresponding Author, translating the Work into any languages. For the participation of the University in the finalization of the Work, the Co-authors agree to pay the invoice issued to them by the University, if such payment is provided by the University. The size and procedure of such payment are not the subject of this contract.
7. The University has the right to reproduce the Work or its parts in electronic and printed forms, to make copies, permanent archival storage of the Work, distribution of the Work on the Internet, repositories, scientometric databases, commercial networks, including for monetary compensation from third parties.
8. The co-authors guarantee that the manuscript of the Work does not use works whose copyright belongs to third parties.
9. The authors of the Work guarantee that at the time of submission of the manuscript of the Work to the Editorial Board, the property rights to the Work belong only to them, neither in whole nor in part have they been transferred to anyone (not alienated), they are not the subject of a lien, litigation or claims by third parties.
10. The Work may not be posted on the University's website if it violates a person's right to the privacy of his personal and family life, harms public order and health.
11. The work may be withdrawn by the Editorial Board from the University websites, libraries and electronic databases where it was placed by the Editorial Board, in cases of detection of violations of the ethics of the authors and researchers, without any compensation for the losses of the Co-authors. At the time of submission of the manuscript to the Editorial Board and all stages of its editing and review, the manuscript must not have already been published or submitted to other editorial offices.
12. The right transferred under this Agreement extends to the territory of Ukraine and foreign countries.
13. The rights of Co-authors include the requirement to indicate their names on all copies of the Work or during any public use or public mention of the Work; the requirement to preserve the integrity of the Work; legal opposition to any distortion or other encroachment on the Work, which may harm the honor and reputation of the Co-authors.
14. Co-authors have the right to control their personal non-property rights by familiarizing themselves with the text (content) and form of the Work before its publication on the University's website, when transferring it to a printing company for reproduction or when using the Work in other ways.
15. The Co-authors, in addition to the property rights not transferred under this Agreement and taking into account the non-exclusive nature of the rights transferred under this Agreement, retain the property rights to finalize the Work and to use certain parts of the Work in other works created by the Co-authors.
16. The Co-authors are obliged to notify the Editorial Board of all errors in the Work, discovered by them independently after the publication of the Work, and to take all measures to eliminate such errors as soon as possible.
17. The University undertakes to indicate the names of the Co-authors on all copies of the Work during any public use of the Work. The list of Co-authors may be shortened according to the rules for the formation of bibliographic descriptions determined by the University or third parties.
18. The University undertakes not to violate the integrity of the Work, to agree with the Corresponding Author on all changes made to the Work during processing and editing.
19. In case of violation of their obligations under this Agreement, its parties bear the responsibility defined by this Agreement and the current legislation of Ukraine. All disputes under the Agreement are resolved through negotiations, and if the negotiations do not resolve the dispute – in the courts of the city of Kharkiv.
20. The parties are not responsible for the violation of their obligations under this Agreement, if it occurred through no fault of theirs. The party is considered innocent if it proves that it has taken all measures dependent on it for the proper fulfillment of the obligation.
21. The Co-authors are responsible for the truthfulness of the facts, quotes, references to legislative and regulatory acts, other official documentation, the scientific validity of the Work, all types of responsibility to third parties who have claimed their rights to the Work. The co-authors reimburse the University for all costs caused by claims of third parties for infringement of copyright and other rights to the Work, as well as additional material costs related to the elimination of identified defects.