Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction. The prevalence and progressive course of myopia is one of the most important medical and social problems worldwide. In recent years, in our country and abroad there is a tendency to increase the incidence of myopia, becoming in some countries an epidemic. In recent years, the most common method of effective control of myopia is the method of refractive therapy with orthokeratological lenses.
Objective: To develop criteria for predicting the effectiveness of myopia control using orthokeratological lenses based on individual eye parameters.
Object and methods of research. A total of 60 children (117 eyes) were included in the clinical study, who were selected by OKL of combined design, SkyOptix, licensed by KATT Design Group (Canada). The average age was 11 [10; 13], from 7 to 14 years, of which 37 were females (61.7%), 23 males (38.3%). Ophthalmological examination consisted of visometry without correction and with optical correction, autorefractometry on the narrow pupil and in the state of drug cycloplegia, biomicroscopy, biometry, ophthalmoscopy of the central and peripheral fundus, keratotopography of the horns, pupilometry.
The results of the research: Among the studied people, the average refractive index at the beginning of the study was -2.25 [-3; -1.5] diopters. The initial diameter of the pupils was determined from 2.78 to 6.30 mm according to the pupilometry performed on the topograph. The average values of eccentricity (Ex) studied in the flat meridian averaged 0.51 [0.47; 0.58], in the steep - 0.53 [0.43; 0.59] at the beginning of the study. In our study, the keratometry of the cornea averaged 43.5 at the beginning of the study [42.7; 44.4].
As a result of probability analysis (increase in APS for two years), the method of construction of logistic regression models was used. We selected five factor features (X): Initial refraction, Pupil diameter (X2), Keratometry (X3), Peripheral corneal force on the reverse zone ring (X4 and X5), Corneal diameter, and Axial length of the eye (APS) at the time of treatment (initial).
The equation of logistic regression of the model for predicting the probability of progression of myopia on the background of the use of OKL had the form:
The classification ability of the model was determined according to the training sample and amounted to 79.5%. The probability of a true positive result (increase in APS less than 0.3) when using this model was 91.9%, and the probability of a true negative result - 38.5%. Evaluation of the quality of the model using ROC-analysis showed the following: the area under the ROC-curve (AUC) was equal to 0.86 (p <0.001), which characterizes the good quality of the classification of traits. The sensitivity of the model was 82.6%, specificity - 73.1%.
As part of the research and mathematical calculations, an interactive WEB application was also developed, which can be accessed from various types of devices connected to the World Wide Web. Modern solutions and approaches used in IT (Information Technology) were used for development.
Conclusions. It is determined that when examining a child with progressive myopia, it is important to pay attention to the diameter of the pupil in photographic conditions, because it can be a predictor of progression and influence the choice of correction individually. The smaller the value of keratometry before the appointment of refractive therapy, the greater the value of the size of the APS, so this factor can be indicated as prognostic. The differential topographic force of the cornea along the peripheral ring corresponding to the reverse zone of the lens is a prognostic practical factor. Taking into account the primary parameters of the eye allows you to customize the approach to each child with myopia, improving the individual design of orthokeratological lenses.
References
Katarhyna, L. A., & Mykhailova, L. A. (2015). Sostoianye detskoi oftalmolohycheskoi sluzhbi ... [State of the children's ophthalmological service …]. RPO, 1, 5–10.
Holden, B. A., Fricke, T. R., Wilson, D. A., Jong, M., Naidoo, K. S., Sankaridurg, P., … & Resnikoff, S. (2016). Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmolo-gy, 123(5), 1036–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
Vitovska, O. P., & Savina, O. M. (2015). Struktura ta chastota khvorob oka ta prydatkovoho apparatu u ditei v Ukraini. [Structure and frequency of diseases of the eye and accessory apparatus in children in Ukraine]. Medychni per-spektyvy [Medical perspectives], 3, 133–138. [In Ukrainian].
Moiseienko, R. O., Holubchykov, M. V., Mykhalchuk, V. M., & Rykov, S. O. (2018). Oftalmolohichna do-pomoha v Ukraini za 2014-2017 roky: analitychno-statystychnyi dovidnyk. [Ophthalmological care in Ukraine for 2014‒2017]. Kropyvnytskyi: POLIUM. 314 p. [In Ukrainian].
Lybman, E. S. (2008). Ynvalydnost vsledstvye patolohyy orhana zrenyia. Oftalmolohyia: rukovodstvo [Disabil-ity due to pathology of the organ of vision. Ophthalmology: a guide]. M. 24 p.
Mynhazova, E. M., Samoilov, A. N., & Shyller, S. Y. (2012). Rol medykosotsіalnіkh faktorov v razvytyy myopyy [The role of medical and social factors in the development of myopia]. KMJ, 6, 958.
Rykov, S. O., & Varyvonchyk, D. V. (2005). Dytiacha slipota ta slabkozorist v Ukraini: Sytuatsiinyi analiz [Childhood blindness and visual impairment in Ukraine: a situational analysis]. Kyiv: Lohos. 80 p.
Lytvynchuk, L. M., Serhiienko, A. M., & Rikhard, H. (2012). Chastota retynalnykh uskladnen pry miopii vysokoho stupenia [The frequency of retinal complications in high myopia]. Ukrainskiy medichniy almanakh [Ukraini-an medical almanac], 5, 109–110.
Verzhanskaia, T. Iu. (2006). Vlyianye ortokeratolohycheskykh lynz na klynyko-funktsyonalnie pokazately myopy-cheskykh hlaz y techenye myopyy [Influence of orthokeratological lenses on clinical and functional parameters of myop-ic eyes during myopia]. Autoref. dis. kand. med. sc.
Epyshyna, M. V. (2015). Klynycheskoe techenye myopyy na fone ortokeratolohycheskoi korrektsyy y funktsy-onalnoho lechenyia [Clinical course of myopia against the background of orthokeratological correction and function-al treatment]. Autoref. dis. kand. med. sc.
Tarutta, E. P., Proskuryna, N. A, & Tarasova, N. A. (2019). Otdalennіe rezultatі ochkovoi korrektsyy s peryfokalnim defokusom u detei s prohressyruiushchei myopyei [Long-term results of spectacle correction with perifo-cal defocus in children with progressive myopia]. Bull ophthalm, 46–53.
Tarutta, E. P., Tarasova, N. A., Mylash, S. V, Proskuryna O. V., & Markosian, H. A. (2019). Vlyianye razlychnikh sredstv korrektsyy myopyy na peryferycheskuiu refraktsyiu v zavysymosty ot napravlenyia vzora [Influence of various means of myopia correction on peripheral defocus in children with progressive myopia]. Bull ophthalm, 4(135), 60‒69.
Tarutta, E. P., Proskuryna, O. V., Mylash, S. V., Ybatulyn, R. A., Tarasova, N. A., Kovichev, A. S., … & Maksymova, M.V. (2015). Yndutsyrovanniy ochkamy "Perifocal-M" peryferycheskyi defokus y prohressyrovanye my-opyy u detei [Perifocal-M spectacle-induced peripheral defocus and progression of myopia in children]. R P Ophthalm, 2, 33–37.
Aller, T. A., Liu, M., & Wildsoet, C. F. (2016). Myopia Control with Bifocal Contact Lenses: A Random-ized Clinical Trial. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 93(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000808
Berntsen, D. A., Barr, C. D., Mutti, D. O., & Zadnik, K. (2013). Peripheral defocus and myopia progression in myopic children randomly assigned to wear single vision and progressive addition lenses. Investigative ophthalmol-ogy & visual science, 54(8), 5761–5770. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-11904
Chia, A., Lu, Q. S., & Tan, D. (2016). Five-Year Clinical Trial on Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2: Myopia Control with Atropine 0.01% Eyedrops. Ophthalmology, 123(2), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.004
Chiang, S. T., & Phillips, J. R. (2018). Effect of Atropine Eye Drops on Choroidal Thinning Induced by Hy-peropic Retinal Defocus. Journal of ophthalmology, 2018, 8528315. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8528315
Chua, W. H., Balakrishnan, V., Chan, Y. H., Tong, L., Ling, Y., Quah, B. L., & Tan, D. (2006). Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia. Ophthalmology, 113(12), 2285–2291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.062
Chung, K., Mohidin, N., & O'Leary, D. J. (2002). Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression. Vision research, 42(22), 2555–2559. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00258-4
Verzhanskaia, T. Iu. (2015). Stabylyzyruiushchyi effekt ortokeratolohycheskoi korrektsyy: rezultatі desiatylet-neho nabliudenyia. [Stabilizing effect of orthokeratological correction: results of a ten-year follow-up]. ROOF, 1, 308‒310.
Tarutta, E. P., Mylash, S. V., Tarasova, N. A., & Epyshyna, M. V. (2015). Indutsyrovanniy peryferycheskyi defokus zadneho poliusa hlaza na fone ortokeratolohycheskoi korrektsyy myopyy [Induced peripheral defocus of the posterior pole of the eye against the background of orthokeratological correction of myopia]. ROJ, 3, 52–56.
Nahorskyi, P. H., Myrsaiafov, D. S., & Chernikh, V. V. (2014). Vlyianye ortokeratolohycheskoi korrektsyy na tempі prohressyrovanyia myopyy [Influence of orthokeratological correction on the rate of myopia progression]. Sov-remennaia optometryia [Modern optometry], 2, 18–23.
Tarutta, E. P., Markosian, H. A., & Mylash, S. V. (2017). Peryferycheskaia refraktsyia y kontur setchatky pry vrozhdennoi y pryobretennoi myopyy visokoi stepeny [Peripheral refraction and retinal contour in high degree congeni-tal myopia]. Bull Ophtalm, 38–42.
Toloraia, R. R. (2010). Yssledovanye effektyvnosty y bezopasnosty nochnikh ortokeratolohycheskykh lynz v lechenyy prohressyruiushchei blyzorukosty [Efficacy and safety study of nighttime orthokeratology in the treatment of progressive myopia]. Autoref. dis. kand. med. sc.
Carkeet, N. L., Mountford, J. A., & Carney, L. G. (1995). Predicting success with orthokeratology lens wear: a retrospective analysis of ocular characteristics. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 72(12), 892–898. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199512000-00007
Cho, P., Cheung, S. W., & Edwards, M. (2005). The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Current eye research, 30(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680590907256
Tarutta, E. P., Tarasova, N. A., Mylash, O. V. (2019). Vlyianye razlychnіkh sredstv korrektsyy myopyy na peryferycheskuiu refraktsyiu v zavysymosty ot napravlenyia vzora [The effect of various means of myopia correction on peripheral refraction depending on the direction of gaze]. Bull Ophtalm, 60–69.
Tarutta, E.P., Yomdyna E.N., Kvaratskhelyia N.H., Mylash S.V., & Kruzhkova, H. V. (2017). Peryfery-cheskaya refrakciya I refraktogenez: prichina ili sledstvie [Peripheral refraction and refractogenesis cause or effect]. Bull Ophtalm, 1(133), 70‒74.
Kang, P., & Swarbrick, H. (2016). The Influence of Different OK Lens Designs on Peripheral Refraction. Op-tometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 93(9), 1112–1119. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000889
Kang, P. (2018). Optical and pharmacological strategies of myopia control. Clinical & experimental optome-try, 101(3), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12666
Queirós, A., González-Méijome, J. M., Jorge, J., Villa-Collar, C., & Gutiérrez, A. R. (2010). Peripheral re-fraction in myopic patients after orthokeratology. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 87(5), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181d951f7
Tarutta, E. P., & Tarasova, N. A. (2015). Prohnostycheskoe y dyahnostycheskoe znachenye obyektyvnoho ak-komodatsyonnoho otveta [Prognostic and diagnostic value of the objective accommodative response]. R P Ophtalm, 1(10), 27‒29.
Fedtke, C., Ehrmann, K., & Bakaraju, R. C. (2020). Peripheral refraction and spherical aberration profiles with single vision, bifocal and multifocal soft contact lenses. Journal of optometry, 13(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.11.002
Gifford, P., Li, M., Lu, H., Miu, J., Panjaya, M., & Swarbrick, H. A. (2013). Corneal versus ocular aberra-tions after overnight orthokeratology. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 90(5), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828ec594
Hiraoka, T., Matsumoto, Y., Okamoto, F., Yamaguchi, T., Hirohara, Y., Mihashi, T., & Oshika, T. (2005). Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. American journal of ophthalmology, 139(3), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.006
Hiraoka, T., Okamoto, C., Ishii, Y., Okamoto, F., & Oshika, T. (2009). Recovery of corneal irregular astig-matism, ocular higher-order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity after discontinuation of overnight orthokeratology. The British journal of ophthalmology, 93(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.136655
Wang, B., Naidu, R. K., & Qu, X. (2017). Factors related to axial length elongation and myopia progression in orthokeratology practice. PloS one, 12(4), e0175913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175913
Chen, Z., Niu, L., Xue, F., Qu, X., Zhou, Z., Zhou, X., & Chu, R. (2012). Impact of pupil diameter on axi-al growth in orthokeratology. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optome-try, 89(11), 1636–1640. PMID: 23026791. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31826c1831
Kang, P., Gifford, P., & Swarbrick, H. (2013). Can manipulation of orthokeratology lens parameters modify peripheral refraction? Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 90(11), 1237–1248. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000064
Carracedo, G., Espinosa-Vidal, T. M., Martínez-Alberquilla, I., & Batres, L. (2019). The Topographical Effect of Optical Zone Diameter in Orthokeratology Contact Lenses in High Myopes. Journal of ophthalmology, 2019, 1082472. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1082472
Gifford, P., Tran, M., Priestley, C., Maseedupally, V., & Kang, P. (2020). Reducing treatment zone diameter in orthokeratology and its effect on peripheral ocular refraction. Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 43(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.006
Marcotte-Collard, R., Simard, P., & Michaud, L. (2018). Analysis of Two Orthokeratology Lens Designs and Comparison of Their Optical Effects on the Cornea. Eye & contact lens, 44(5), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000495
Wang, J., Yang, D., Bi, H., Du, B., Lin, W., Gu, T., Zhang, B., & Wei, R. (2018). A New Method to Ana-lyze the Relative Corneal Refractive Power and Its Association to Myopic Progression Control with Orthokeratology. Translational vision science & technology, 7(6), 17. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.17
Pospelov, V. I. (2007). Etiolohiya, patohenez y principi patogeneticheskoy terapii progressirovaniya myopii u detey [Etiology, pathogenesis and principles of pathogenetic therapy of myopia progression in children] Modern tech-nologies of drug treatment in ophthalmology: materials of scientific-practical. conf. ophthalmologists. K., 1–21.
"Inter Collegas" is an open access journal: all articles are published in open access without an embargo period, under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution ‒ Noncommercial ‒ Share Alike) license; the content is available to all readers without registration from the moment of its publication. Electronic copies of the archive of journals are placed in the repositories of the KhNMU and V.I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine.